In a startling case of administrative negligence that highlights the profound impact of technological glitches within the justice system, the Gujarat High Court has taken a significant step towards rectifying a grave error. Chandanji Thakor, a 27-year-old convict serving a life sentence for murder, endured three additional years of imprisonment despite being granted bail in 2020. This unfortunate delay was attributed to the prison authorities’ failure to implement the court’s bail order, which had been sent via email.
The Tragic Sequence of Events
The High Court had, on September 29, 2020, suspended Chandanji Thakor’s life sentence, thereby granting him bail. The High Court’s registry promptly communicated this pivotal decision to the jail authorities through email. However, the wheels of justice came to a grinding halt as a result of two unfortunate factors: the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and the alleged incapacity of the authorities to open the attachment containing the bail order. This unfortunate combination of events led to a prolonged and unjust imprisonment for Thakor.
Court’s Strong Rebuke
Upon discovering the egregious oversight, a division bench comprising Justice AS Supehia and Justice MR Mengdey did not mince words in their criticism. They rebuked both the jail authorities and the District Legal Services Authority (DLSA) for their inaction in this case. Despite having received the email that could have secured Thakor’s release, no tangible efforts were made to ensure that the court’s decision was executed correctly.
Compensation for a Lost Time
In recognition of the shocking delay and the gross miscarriage of justice endured by Chandanji Thakor, the Gujarat High Court has ordered the State to pay ₹1 lakh in compensation. This compensation serves as a stark reminder of the severity of the prison authorities’ negligence and the profound consequences it had on an individual’s life and liberty.
A Wake-Up Call
This case stands as an eye-opener, shedding light on the critical need for efficient communication and technological proficiency within the justice system. It underscores that even a small hiccup in the digital flow of information can have devastating consequences, depriving an individual of their freedom.
Ensuring Accountability
To prevent such egregious errors in the future, the court has directed all District Legal Services Authorities (DLSAs) to compile data on prisoners who have been granted bail but remain in custody due to various reasons. The court has set October 18 as the date for a follow-up hearing to ensure compliance with these directives, reaffirming the importance of accountability within the justice system.
