Supreme Court Rejects Plea for Erecting Wall Along Ram Setu
The Supreme Court of India has declined to entertain a plea filed by the Hindu Personal Law Board. This plea sought directions for the construction of a wall at the Ram Setu site, as well as the management of darshan (sacred viewing) at the site, and the declaration of Ram Setu as a national monument.
The Plea and Its Purpose
The Hindu Personal Law Board’s plea proposed the construction of a wall in the sea, extending for a few meters, and possibly even a kilometer. The primary objective was to make the Adam’s Bridge, also known as Ram Setu, visible for devotees to perform Darshan. According to the board, witnessing this Setu is crucial for attaining Moksha (salvation).
The board also argued that the government had not taken the necessary steps to manage the Darshan of Ram Setu. They contended that it was essential for the government to play a role in ensuring access to this sacred site.
The Significance of Ram Setu
Ram Setu, or Adam’s Bridge, holds immense significance in Hindu mythology. It is believed to be the bridge constructed under the orders of Lord Rama to reach Lanka and vanquish the demon king, Ravan. The sighting of this bridge is not only a matter of faith but also a source of spiritual fulfillment for millions of devotees.
The Government’s Perspective
The government of Bharat has expressed its commitment to bringing about Ram Rajya, a state of utopia and ideal governance according to Hindu beliefs. However, they argue that the Darshan of Ram Setu should be managed in a way that respects environmental and ecological concerns.
Erecting a wall in the sea presents its own set of challenges, including the need for careful consideration of marine life and the ecosystem. The depth of the water around the Setu varies between 4 feet and 40 feet along the span of the bridge, making any construction a complex endeavor.
The Court’s Decision
The Supreme Court’s decision to reject the plea was based on the belief that such matters were primarily administrative concerns of the government. In the words of the court, “What can the court do? These are administrative matters of the government. Why should we get into it?”
Additionally, the court declined to merge this plea with a similar matter that was already pending before it. This move was met with resistance, as one of the justices remarked, “No. Suddenly you want to say my name should also be added.”
FAQs
- Why is Ram Setu important in Hindu mythology? Ram Setu is believed to be the bridge constructed by Lord Rama to reach Lanka and defeat the demon king, Ravan. It holds immense significance in Hindu mythology.
- What was the purpose of the plea filed by the Hindu Personal Law Board? The plea aimed to seek directions for the construction of a wall at the Ram Setu site to make it visible for devotees and to declare it a national monument.
- Why did the Supreme Court reject the plea? The Supreme Court deemed such matters as administrative concerns of the government and declined to get involved.
- What challenges are associated with erecting a wall at the Ram Setu site? Challenges include environmental and ecological considerations due to the varying depth of water in the area.
- What is the significance of Ram Rajya in this context? Ram Rajya represents an ideal state of governance in Hindu beliefs, and the government seeks to achieve it while respecting environmental concerns related to Ram Setu.
